#MACSPARKY BUSYCONTACTS HOW TO#
#MACSPARKY BUSYCONTACTS MANUAL#
#MACSPARKY BUSYCONTACTS FULL#

They want publishers to post full content to Facebook. David Carr ran an article in the NY Times last October that previewed the pitch we'll likely hear. The part that caught my attention is the section that mentions Facebook’s discussions with content publishers. This morning I read Dave Winer’s “When will the 140-char wall come down” that aside from the focus of the piece is the secondary focus on mobile. Mobile Apps and Enabling Content Use and Reuse If this is your thing, give Brett’s sit down with MacSparky and Katie a go and you are more than likely going to find one or more tip to up your game, if not get much more out of it. It will be more capable and usable in the next few months with the iOS 11 and the next MacOS update, High Sierra. While we never got the world I swore was going to be the next logical step, or at least as an option, we do have something interesting now. Years back I was really certain (the kind of certain driven by hope, more than knowing) Mac was going to provide a tag only option, which was going to be really good, as files have multiple contexts and tags can adapt for that reality (which is far closer to life than nested folders). I have been playing the long game with MacOS tagging in hopes that it would also sync to iOS. I am deeply excited about iOS getting tags that come over from Mac, which is why I have been tagging things for the past few years.

#MACSPARKY BUSYCONTACTS MANUAL#

While things are mostly tagging standards based, the implementations are still a bit on the manual and geek scripting side of things. This episode digs deep into what is coming in iOS and current state of tagging on Macs.

This week’s Mac Power Users is an interview on tagging with Brett Terpstra. If you are still following along here it is likely in hopes of something related to tagging or folksonomy (I have a stack of folksonomy and tagging things piled up, but not written-up) so today you win. I know nothing other than a hunch, but playing around with this idea for years, I’m seeing the potential could be around the corner. A raise of the eyebrow could scroll up options, a side smile left moves to preferred options and side smile right moves to next screen. feature options and light contextual information options for simple / calm interfaces. Look out a few years and start to see not Animoji, but people talking to Siri to bring up an app on their wrist, car heads-up display, or (rather banal) iPhone and use facial interactions to swipe, scroll, sort, etc.

#MACSPARKY BUSYCONTACTS HOW TO#

This seems very similar to Microsoft’s using the Solitaire game in early Windows to provide a fun interaction as a means to train people how to use a mouse and get comfortable with it. People are learning to interact with a facial scan interface for fun and learning the capabilities so to be comfortable with it. It is this second piece, the live interaction where I have a strong hunch Apple is seeding things for the future. The other piece is people interacting with their screens and the live face scans of muscles and facial features moving. One piece is the face identification system that Apple has in the iPhone X and the 30,000 dots it uses on people faces to ascertain an identity, which makes it difficult for someone to use a photo or mask of a person to gain access. This is similar to other platform’s and service’s offerings.īut, there is something I think a little different about what Apple is doing. In the September 2017 Apple iPhone 8 and iPhone X announcement Keynote they demonstrated the Apple ARKit driven face emoji, Amimoji.

Animoji Trains Future Interaction Interface

Macsparky busycontacts